Skyfall: A Review


Ok, perhaps this will be less of a review and more of an observation/gripefest. Meaning no spoilers, m’kay?

In a nutshell, this was a very good movie– but it wasn’t a Bond movie.

Allow me to explain.

Yes, the movie has the same characters (M, Q, Bond, Moneypenny, etc) and he’s still a roguish 007 agent for MI6. And yes, he has to come to the rescue of queen and country.

But that’s it. It might as well have been Mission Impossible V: The Knock List Revisited.

It’s like they rebooted the Bond franchise, and in doing so wiped the slate clean of all quintessential Bondness.

Gone are the gadgets, the shaken not stirred martinis, the arch villains (and even more arch henchmen), the womanizing, and the double-entendres.

No more Pussy Galore. No more Jaws. No more Aston Martins with ejector seats. No more tongue-in-cheek humor.

Instead we get… realism. We get a damaged and human Agent Bond thrown into pulled-from-the-headlines cyberterror crises of state.

I’m not saying it isn’t good– it just isn’t “Bond”.

The main character’s name might as well have been James Hunt. Or James Solo. Or James Steed.

So, while I thoroughly enjoyed the latest Bond film, I can’t help also feeling a bit disappointed by it, too.

I’m an old school Bond purist who relished the escapism and sheer bombast of it all. And evidently that James Bond is dead.

They killed him before the opening credits.

I’m gonna have to add a small tear to my little octopussy tattoo.


About cb

Nickname: Munt Measurements: 45 B, 34, 38(?) Ambition: to be the best human ever! Turn ons: long walks on the beach, romantic dinners, porn, rainbows, cock Turn offs: bad smell face, men who are full of themselves, dead puppies, popcorn, sadness
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Skyfall: A Review

  1. I don’t remember the last Bond movie I watched, but I noticed then that the “cheesey” factor was on the decline. The cheese is what makes Bond Bond. If I wanted realism, I’d watch a reality show. 😉

  2. Mark, nee Fuzz says:

    Blah blah blah. I don’t care. It’s got Daniel Craig. That’s all I care about. Yes, I am exactly that shallow.

  3. Blobby says:

    I’m ok w the gadgets but ugh, that cheesy dialogue that used to be there was horrid. …and there was one martini and it was vigorously shaken. I prefer this one to anything Pierce Brosnon did. He was b.a.d. Not “Mama Mia” bad, but still he was bad.

  4. Dirk says:

    The Daniel Craig Bond films are the only ones I’ve seen all the way through (due in large part to the absence of those gadgets which I consider lazy plot devices at best).

    • cb says:

      Creating an *actual* Lotus Esprit that turns into a submarine isn’t “lazy”. Writing soap opera plots involving amnesia, evil twins, and bringing people back from the dead is “lazy”.

  5. Blobby says:

    oh….and that’s Alotta Vagina.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s